Geographic Arbitrage

Best Cities for Urban and Regional Planners Salaries

Nominal salary vs cost-of-living-adjusted purchasing power. They are often very different.

Nominal salary tells you how much money you receive. Cost-of-living-adjusted salary tells you how much that money can actually buy. A $200,000 salary in San Francisco and a $140,000 salary in Austin can provide nearly identical purchasing power. Tax differences are not included.

Where Should I Live?

Nominal vs COL-Adjusted Salary

#LocationMedian (Nominal)COL IndexAdjustedCOL Rank
1 San Francisco, CA $79,914 138.5 $57,699 #6 (-5)
2 New York, NE $70,500 90.8 $77,643 #1 (+1)
3 DALLAS, TX $70,013 92.7 $75,526 #2 (+1)
4 Washington, DC $70,000 146.0 $47,945 #9 (-5)
5 New York, NY $68,000 125.1 $54,357 #8 (-3)
6 Los Angeles, CA $65,606 138.5 $47,369 #10 (-4)
7 Boston, MA $65,250 146.5 $44,539 #11 (-4)
8 Chicago, IL $64,000 92.3 $69,339 #3 (+5)
9 Houston, TX $61,360 92.7 $66,192 #4 (+5)
10 Watertown, MA $60,000 146.5 $40,956 #12 (-2)
11 Austin, TX $56,035 92.7 $60,448 #5 (+6)
12 Atlanta, GA $52,083 91.0 $57,234 #7 (+5)

Key Insights

  • The highest nominal salary for Urban and Regional Planners is in San Francisco, CA at $79,914, but after cost-of-living adjustment New York, NE offers the best purchasing power at $77,643 equivalent.
  • Hidden gem: Austin, TX ranks #11 by nominal pay but climbs to #5 once cost of living is factored in (up 6 spots), making its $56,035 go a lot further.
  • Beware: San Francisco, CA looks strong at #1 on nominal pay ($79,914) but its high cost of living drops it 5 spots to #6 on purchasing power.
Salary Check

Are you a Urban and Regional Planners wondering if you are underpaid?

Compare your pay against government-filed salary data for this role.