Geographic Arbitrage

Best Cities for Purchasing Managers Salaries

Nominal salary vs cost-of-living-adjusted purchasing power. They are often very different.

Nominal salary tells you how much money you receive. Cost-of-living-adjusted salary tells you how much that money can actually buy. A $200,000 salary in San Francisco and a $140,000 salary in Austin can provide nearly identical purchasing power. Tax differences are not included.

Where Should I Live?

Nominal vs COL-Adjusted Salary

#LocationMedian (Nominal)COL IndexAdjustedCOL Rank
1 Cupertino, CA $143,999 138.5 $103,970 #3 (-2)
2 Sunnyvale, CA $134,550 138.5 $97,148 #5 (-3)
3 San Francisco, CA $132,080 138.5 $95,365 #6 (-3)
4 Seattle, WA $120,000 114.6 $104,712 #2 (+2)
5 Fremont, CA $109,000 138.5 $78,700 #8 (-3)
6 Houston, TX $105,894 92.7 $114,233 #1 (+5)
7 New York, NY $100,000 125.1 $79,936 #7
8 Columbus, IN $93,909 91.0 $103,197 #4 (+4)
9 Los Angeles, CA $88,442 138.5 $63,857 #10 (-1)
10 Miami, FL $76,164 102.8 $74,089 #9 (+1)

Key Insights

  • The highest nominal salary for Purchasing Managers is in Cupertino, CA at $143,999, but after cost-of-living adjustment Houston, TX offers the best purchasing power at $114,233 equivalent.
  • Hidden gem: Houston, TX ranks #6 by nominal pay but climbs to #1 once cost of living is factored in (up 5 spots), making its $105,894 go a lot further.
  • Beware: Sunnyvale, CA looks strong at #2 on nominal pay ($134,550) but its high cost of living drops it 3 spots to #5 on purchasing power.
Salary Check

Are you a Purchasing Managers wondering if you are underpaid?

Compare your pay against government-filed salary data for this role.